VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Kumaresan v. The State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 1800/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) in connection with the Cr.No.20 of 2026, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The allegations against the petitioners are that due to land dispute, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and assaulted him causing injuries. Hence, the case.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons, and they have been falsely implicated in this case by the respondent police. He further submit that the it is a case and case in counter and petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and on instructions, submitted that the injured was discharged from hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners, and that the investigation in this case is still pending and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Page3 of 5

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, the injured was discharged from hospital and the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District, on condition that the each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., for a period two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or Page4 of 5 tamper with the evidence; [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023. 09-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JAI To

¶1The Inspector of Police, Chinnasalem Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

¶2The Judicial Magistrate, Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o1800oofo2026 K.RAJASEKAR,oJ. JAI CRLoOPoNo.o1800oofo2026 09-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1. K.Kumaresan 2. V.Karuppannan 3. K.Anjali 4. K.Velu ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Chinnasalem Police Station, Kallakurichi District. (Crime No. 20/2026) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to pass an order releasing the Petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.20 /2026 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Varatharajan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side) Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.