- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 January 2026
- Bench
- K.Rajasekar
- Case no.
- CRL OP 1690/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
08.01.2026 for the offence under Sections 123 of BNS, and 22(a) of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 in Crime No.28 of 2026, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that based on a secret information, the respondent police went to the spot and found that the petitioner was in possession of 1.900 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence a case was registered by the respondent police.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is one previous case pending against the petitioner and they have recovered the tobacco products from the petitioner.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the quantity involved in this case is not a commercial quantity and the period of incarceration undergone by the Petitioner this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner herein with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruppur,Tiruppur District and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
27.01.2026 smn Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
1.The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur North Police Station, Tiruppur District.
¶2The learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District
¶3The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
K. RAJASEKAR, J. smn Crl.O.P. No.1690 of 2026
27.01.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1690 of 2026 Udhayakumar ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur North Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.28 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.