M.P.Anand v. The Managing Director

ORDER Mr. M. Sekar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of R1 and R3. Mr. B. Anandakumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of R2.

¶2This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to establish a TASMAC Shop and BAR at the premises morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

¶3The petitioner claims that since the proposed TASMAC Shop at the premises morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition is within 500 meters from the National Highway, the said TASMAC Shop and BAR cannot be established.

¶4The petitioner is a neighbouring land owner. He has given a representation on 06.01.2026 to the respondents, requesting them not to establish a TASMAC Shop and BAR in the premises morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.

¶5No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the necessary parties including the landlord of the property as well as the lease holder of the BAR as well as any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026.

¶7For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026, requesting the second respondent not to establish a TASMAC Shop and BAR at the premises morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the necessary parties including the landlord of the property as well as the lease holder of the BAR as well as any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire after giving due consideration to the documents filed along with the petitioner's representation.

¶8Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 10-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Managing Director TASMAC Limited, No.4th Floor, CMDA Tower, Gandhi Irwin Bridge, Egmore, Chennai.

2.The District Collector Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

3.The District Manager/ Sub Collector TASMAC Limited, Angeripalayam, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. WPeNo.e3561eofe2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. ab WPoNo.o3561oofo2026 ANDoWMPoNO.o3993o OFo2026 10-02-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE AND WMP NO. 3993 OF 2026 1. M.P.Anand Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Managing Director TASMAC Limited, No.4th Floor, CMDA Tower, Gandhi Irwin Bridge, Egmore, Chennai. 2.The District Collector Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. 3.The District Manager/ Sub Collector TASMAC Limited, Angeripalayam, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondent No.2,3 to consider the representation dated 6.1.2026 for not establishing a TASMAC Shop ad its bar comprising S.No.431/B1 situated at Gandhi Road, Periyar Colony, Tiruppur, within a time bound manner fixed by this Honourable Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Myilsamy For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sekar For R1 and R3 Mr.B.Anandakumar Govt Advocate For R2