VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Kanakaraj, v. Government of Tamil Nadu,

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 February 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 5267/2026

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.02.2026 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. Nos.5267 and 5527 of 2026 C. Kanakaraj … Petitioner in W.P. No.5267 of 2026 J. Amalorpavam … Petitioner in W.P. No.5527 of 2026 Vs

¶1Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.

¶2The Chief Executive Officer Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board Chennai House, I Floor Chennai 600 104. … Respondents Prayer in W.P. No.5267 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the encashment of unearned leave on private affairs to the petitioner, consequent on her retirement on 31/5/2016 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to pay encashment of unearned leave on private affairs to the petitioner Page No. 1 of 6 within the time frame stipulated by this Court along with interest at the rate of 10% p.a., from the date when the terminal benefits became due till the date of actual disbursement. Prayer in W.P. No.5527 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the commuted value of pension and encashment of unearned leave on private affairs to the petitioner, consequent on her retirement on 30/6/2016 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to pay commuted value of pension and encashment of unearned leave on private affairs to the petitioner within the time frame stipulated by this Court along with interest at the rate of 10% p.a., from the date when the terminal benefits became due till the date of actual disbursement. In both W.P.s For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondents : Mr.R.Ramanlal Additional Advocate General

Assisted by Mr.Yokesh Kannadasan Spl.Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr.C.Ramkumar for R2 - - - Page No. 2 of 6 COMMON ORDER By consent, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.These writ petitions have been filed for declaration declaring that the action of the respondents in not paying the commuted value of pension and encashment of unearned leave on private affairs to the respective petitioners as illegal and also to direct the respondents to pay the same with interest.

3.The issue that arises for consideration in these writ petitions is one and the same and therefore, this Court is inclined to pass a common order.

4.The petitioner in these writ petitions have joined in the service of the second respondent and retired from service on 31.05.2016 and 30.06.2016 respectively. The petitioners were duly relieved from their respective services. Though the petitioners were sanctioned in respect of pension, the respondents failed to pay commuted value of pension and encashment of unearned leave on private affairs. Page No. 3 of 6

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on the either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

6.The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that due to financial crisis, the first respondent is unable to mobilze funds and further submitted that the second respondent has addressed various letters to the first respondent for allotment of funds and the same was also informed to the petitioners. Further, he submits that only on allocation of funds, the second respondent will be in a position to settle the dues of the petitioners, as per their seniority. Hence, he prays for issuance of appropriate directions by this Court as well as to stipulate any time frame.

¶7Based on the aforesaid submissions, it is evident that due to financial crisis, the retiral benefits / terminal benefits due to the petitioners were not settled. It could be seen that the petitioners herein were retired from service prior to four years and the reason of financial distress cannot serve as a ground for making this kind of belated payments. Therefore, the said reason cannot be accepted by this Court and the petitioners, who were retired personnel's financial position have to be kept in mind. Page No. 4 of 6

¶8In such view of the matter, the first respondent is directed to allot necessary funds to the second respondent for settling dues to the petitioners, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such receipt, the second respondent is directed to disburse the dues of the petitioners forthwith with applicable interest.

¶9With the above directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

18.02.2026 Index: Yes/No vsi2 To

¶1The Principal Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.

¶2The Chief Executive Officer Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board Chennai House, I Floor Chennai 600 104. Page No. 5 of 6

M.DHANDAPANI, J. vsi2 W.P. Nos.5267 and 5527 of 2026.P. Nos.5267 and 5527 of 2026

18.02.2026 Page No. 6 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.