- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 January 2026
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP 2736/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.T. Asha
Judgment
O R D E R This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to correct the name of the mother in the Birth Certificate of her Children, i.e., R.Jayaprathip and R.Hemapriyan.
¶2The petitioner would submit that she is the mother of the minor children R.Jayaprathip and R.Hemapriyan. The said Jayaprathip was born on 27.12.2011 and the said Hemapriyan was born on 10.07.2013. Their births were duly registered with the respondents and birth certificates have been issued.
¶3The petitioner would submit that in the birth certificate of her children her name has been wrongly typed as "Kala". Therefore, the petitioner has submitted her representation dated 21.11.2025, to which the 2nd respondent has issued a reply that as per provisions of Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, he cannot correct the entry and advised the petitioner to effect gazette notification and submit the gazette notification along with original birth certificates. Therefore, the representation of the petitioner has not been disposed of in the manner known to law in as much as the petitioner has not been called for an enquiry. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking the relief set out supra.
¶4Heard the rival submissions on the either side and perused the records.
¶5Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, reads as follows: "Correction or Cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths: If it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry of a birth or death in any register kept by him under this Act is erroneous in form or substance, or has been fraudulently or improperly made, he may, subject to such rules as may be made by the State Government with respect to the conditions on which and the circumstances in which such entries may be corrected or cancelled, correct the error or cancel the entry by suitable entry in the margin, without any alteration of the original entry, and shall sign the marginal entry and add thereto the date of the correction or cancellation."
¶6Rule 11 (1) of the Tamil Nadu Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2000, would read as follows: "Correction or cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths under Section 15:
(i)It is reported to the Registrar that a clerical or formal error has been made in the register or if such error is otherwise noticed by him and if the register is in his possession, the Registrar shall enquire into the matter and if he is satisfied that any such error has been made, he shall correct the error (by correcting or canceling the entry) as provided in Section 15 and shall in the case of local authorities specified in column (1) of the Table below send an extract of the entry showing the error and how it has been corrected to the officer specified in column (2) thereof. Local Authorities (1) Officers (2) Village Panchayat Village
Panchayat President Town Panchayat Executive Officer Contonment -do-Municipality Commissioner Neyveli
Lignite Corporation Chief Health Officer Corporation Commissioner
¶7A perusal of the above clearly indicates that the 2nd respondent is empowered to correct an error or cancel the erroneous or improper entry. The rules clearly sets out that if it is reported to the Registrar that a clerical or formal error has been made, he can conduct an enquiry and on being satisfied with the error been made, he is empowered to correct the same.
¶8Therefore, a reply given by the 2nd respondent dated
02.12.2025 is absolutely erroneous particularly when the petitioner seeks to correct an erroneous entry.
¶9Accordingly, a mandamus is issued to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner, in the light of the language of the above rules, after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to submit her case, within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶10With the above observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
28.01.2026
kan To
¶1The Zonal Officer, Zone: 5, Ward: 032, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, EVR Periyar Salai (Poonamallee High Road) Park Town, Chennai.
¶2The Registrar of Births and Deaths, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, EVR Periyar Salai (Poonamallee High Road) Park Town, Chennai.
¶3The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, EVR Periyar Salai (Poonamallee High Road) Park Town, Chennai. P.T. ASHA, J
kan
28.01.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 28.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 2736 of 2026 R.Chitra ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Zonal Officer, Zone: 5, Ward: 032, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, EVR Periyar Salai (Poonamallee High Road) Park Town, Chennai. 2. The Registrar of Births and Deaths, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, EVR Periyar Salai (Poonamallee High Road) Park Town, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, EVR Periyar Salai (Poonamallee High Road) Park Town, Chennai. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to correct the name of the mother in the Birth Certificate of her Children R.Jayaprathip born on 27/12/2011 at RSM Hospital, 70, CEMENTARY ROAD, CHENNAI. The birth was duly registered with the respondent authority and a Birth Certificate bearing Registration No.2012/05/052/000372 dated 18/1/2012 was issued on 10/2/2012 and her second son R.Hemapriyan born on 10/7/2011 at RSM Hospital, 70, CEMENTARY ROAD, CHENNAI. The birth was duly registered with the respondent authority and a Birth Certificate bearing Registration No.2013/05/052/005902/0 dated 16/7/2013 and same was issued 10/9/2013, based on the petitioner's representation dated 21/11/2025, within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms. B.Sri Padmaja For Respondents : Mr. S.Gopinathan Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.