- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 February 2026
- Bench
- P.B. Balaji
- Case no.
- CRP 753/2026
Judgment
ORDER The tenant is the revision petitioner. The tenant is aggrieved by the order of delivery passed in EP.No.1252 of 2025, without notice to the petitioner/tenant as mandated under Section 39 of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017.
¶2Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent/landlord states that the petitioner's appeal is pending in RLTA No.18 of 2026 before the III Additional City Civil Court Chennai and the petitioner is not cooperating with the earlier disposal of the appeal.
¶3Per contra, Mr.Samir Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner denies the said allegation and states that the proceedings are adjourned only on account of non availability of the Judicial Officer.
¶4I have held, in the order dated 16.12.2025 passed in CRP.No.5723 of 2025 (M/s.B.D.V.S.Showroom vs. T.Rajendran), that under Section 39 of the Act, notice to the tenant/judgment debtor is mandatory and a pre-requisite Page3 of 4 before ordering delivery, and provisions of Order XXI of CPC will not apply to the proceedings under the said enactment.
¶5In the light of the above, the order of delivery passed by the Rent Court is certainly not in order. However, considering the fact that the tenant's appeal is pending in RLTA No.18 of 2026 before the III Additional City Civil Court Chennai, I direct the learned III Additional City Civil Court Chennai to dispose of the said RLTA within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantime, EP proceedings in EP.No.1252 of 2025 shall be kept in abeyance. Subject to the result of the RLTA, it shall be open to the Rent Court to proceed with the Execution Petition, but it shall not be open to the petitioner/tenant to thereafter canvas before the Executing Court that he had no notice in the E.P.
¶6The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order PVS To The XVI Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. Page4 of 4
P.B.BALAJI, J. PVS 16-02-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and CMP.No.3962 of 2026 M/s.IZZI Tools Centre, Rep.Murtaza Bhai Miyajiwala, Having shop at Ground floor, Old Door No.12/13, New Door No.23, Perianna Maistry Street, Chennai 600 001. Correspondence address, No.11-A Singanna Naicken Street Parry's Corner, George Town, Chennai 600 001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs H.G.Sons Estates, Represented by Mohammed Yusuf Madraswala, S/o.Yusuf Madraswala, Having Office: No.194, Anna Pillai Street, 'STS' Complex, Chennai -600 001. ..Respondent(s) Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 18.12.2025 made in E.P.No.1252 of 2025 in RLTOP No.507 of 2024 on the file of learned XVI Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Samir Shah for M/s.Shah And Shah For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.