- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 February 2026
- Bench
- The Chief Justice, G.Arul Murugan
- Case no.
- WP 3458/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow The Chief JusticeFollow G.Arul Murugan
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) According to the petitioner, the land which has been allotted to the private respondent could not have been allotted to him and, therefore, it amounts to encroachment.
¶2It cannot be said to be a case of encroachment. If the contentions of the petitioner were to be accepted, perhaps, it could be a case of illegal allotment.
¶3The order of the fourth respondent/Tahsildar rejects the contention of the petitioner.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, refers to another memo dated 8.9.2022 of the fifth respondent/Special Tahsildar, which was forwarded to the fourth respondent, but not properly appreciated.
¶5In that view of the matter, instead of we going into various aspects of the matter that pertains to allotment of house sites to Adi-Dravidars and scrutinizing the revenue records, it is appropriate to direct the Collector to examine the correctness of the order dated
14.8.2025, which has been passed by the fourth respondent and take appropriate decision after affording an opportunity of hearing to the private respondent. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim application stands closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
10.02.2026 Index : : sasi To:
1.The District Collector Office of Collectorate, Viluppuram.
2.The District Revenue Officer Office of Collectorate, Viluppuram.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Viluppuram.
4.The Tahsildar Office of the Tahsildar Vikkravandi Taluk, Viluppuram District.
5.The Special Tahsildar Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Office of the Tahsildar, Viluppuram. THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
(sasi)
10.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.3890 of 2026 B.Priyanka W/o.Pasupathi 3/236, Backside to Putilayiamman Kovil, Pudhu Colony, Radhapuram Post, Vikkravandi Taluk, Viluppuram District-605 501. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Office of Collectorate, Viluppuram. 2.The District Revenue Officer Office of Collectorate, Viluppuram. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Viluppuram. 4.The Tahsildar Office of the Tahsildar Vikkravandi Taluk, Viluppuram District. 5.The Special Tahsildar Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Office of the Tahsildar, Viluppuram. 6.K.Dhanasekaran S/o.Kuppan, Puthilayiamman Kovil Street, Pudhu Colony, Radhapuram Post, Vikkravandi Taluk, Viluppuram District-605 501 Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 4th respondent in R.C. No.A2/1070/2025, dated 14.08.2025, quash the same and consequently direct the official respondents to remove the encroachment and restore the land for public purpose. For Petitioner: Mr.A.Tamilarasan For Respondents: Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for R1 to R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.