VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

N.Manimegalai v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP 5021/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER Complaining about the enjoyment of the property by the petitioner who is the senior citizen and the safety, his dignity at this advanced age, it is seen that an application is made under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, however, to the District Collector, Salem. It is further stated that the said representation has already been forwarded to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem, the second respondent herein who is the competent authority as per the Act. Therefore, the petitioner prays that the application be disposed of.

2.When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate taking notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation is made only to the Collector. The fourth respondent is represented by the learned Government Advocate would submit that the role of Page3 of 4 the Police would come, if only final orders are passed in the petition. Considering the nature of Order that is passed, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage without notice to the respondents 5 and 6. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits or the correctness of the allegation made by the petitioner. The Writ Petition is disposed of on the following terms:-

i)If the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2025 is not made over to the second respondent till date, the same shall be made over within one week from the date of the receipt of the web copy of the order. As and when the representation is made over to the file of the second respondent, the second respondent shall conduct an enquiry in the manner known to law by issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the respondents 4 and 5 or any other person interested and pass final orders thereon in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than five months from the date of receipt of the web copy of the order.

ii)No costs. 17-02-2026 ep Page4 of 4

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. ep To:-

¶1The District Collector Salem District, Salem.

¶2The Tahsildar Salem Revenue Division, Salem.

¶3The Tahsildar Salem Taluk, Salem.

¶4The Inspector of Police Magudanchavadi Police Station, Salem District. 17-02-2026

5.

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY N.Manimegalai ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Salem District, Salem. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem Revenue Division, Salem. 3. The Tahsildar Salem Taluk, Salem. 4. The Inspector of Police Magudanchavadi Police Station, Salem District. 5. Selvakumar 6. Mainavathi ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction or any other nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide protection under the Page2 of 4 Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, based on the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2025 for the petitioner's peaceful living in the petitioner's house and properties without any hindrance from the respondents 5 and 6. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai Government Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.J.Subbiah Government Advocate for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.