- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 March 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 8183/2026
Judgment
ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the Respondents.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.
¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 29.04.2025 passed by the first respondent. The petitioner had earlier preferred an appeal on 03.08.2023 as against the order dated 13.02.2023 passed by the second respondent. However, the said appeal came to be rejected on the ground of limitation, without examining the merits of the case. Aggrieved by such rejection, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present Writ Petition.
¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present Writ Petition has been filed only on
25.02.2026. Page3 of 6
¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner has already deposited 10% of the disputed tax at the time of filing the appeal. It is further submitted that the petitioner is willing to deposit the remaining 90% of the disputed tax, as a condition for agitating his grievances before the Appellate Authority.
¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- "10% have paid while filing of appeal. I will pay 90% of the tax demand."
¶7Recording the above consent given by the petitioner, the case is remitted back to the first Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 90% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶8In case there has been any recovery or any other amount paid by the Petitioner towards the tax liability confirmed vide impugned order dated
29.04.2025, the same shall be set off against the pre-deposit of 10% as ordered above. This shall however be subject to verification by the Respondents.
Page4 of 6
¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the first Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, without reference to limitation. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.
¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 90% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondents are at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the second Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page5 of 6
¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
04.03.2026 kmm To
¶1The Deputy Commissioner (CT) DC GST Appeal, Chennai-1, Greams Road, Main Building, 2nd Floor, Chennai - 600 006.
¶2The Deputy State Tax Officer, Kothawalchavadi Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes Office Complex, 3rd Floor, Room No. 313, No. 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai - 600 003. Page6 of 6
C.SARAVANAN, J. kmm W.P.No.8183 of 2026
04.03.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN W.P.No.8183 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.8862 of 2026 Shri. Sabeer Mohamed Proprietor of Tvl. Aasiya Trading Company, Old No. 31, Malaya Perumal Street, Parrys, Chennai - 600 001. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) DC GST Appeal, Chennai-1, Greams Road, Main Building, 2nd Floor, Chennai - 600 006. 2. The Deputy State Tax Officer, Kothawalchavadi Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes Office Complex, 3rd Floor, Room No. 313, No. 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai - 600 003. ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with order passed by the First Respondent vide Order in APL 02 Ref No. ZD3304252152310 dated 29.04.2025 and quash the same as being contrary to law and consequentially direct the First Respondent to decide the matter on merits and pass. For Petitioner : Mr.Balachandar R For Respondents : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate. Page2 of 6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.