VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sree Abirami Charitable Trust v. The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 January 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP 2627/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed for the Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of Respondents relating to the order of the 1st Respondent in Lr.No. Affln. III (2)/ 16901/ 2025 dated 09.01.2026 and quash the same and directing the 1st respondent University to accept the necessary documents and the prescribed fees from the petitioner required for granting permission to increase in the annual intake of seats in the existing course Viz., BPT Course from 50 to 100 Seats in the Petitioners College Viz., Sree Abirami College of Physiotherapy, without insisting upon an order from the State Government in line with the Judgement in W.A. No. 3534 of 2019 dated

16.06.2020 as confirmed in S.L.P. (C) NO.16085 of 2020 dated 12.01.2021.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel taking notice on behalf the respondents are at idem that the issue has already been covered and the order that is passed Page3 of 6 in W.P.Nos.558 and 1160 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 and the same order can be passed in the present Writ Petition.

¶3Since the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is identical to the issue involved in W.P.Nos.558 and 1160 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026, it is apropos to extract the relevant portion of paragraphs 3 to 5 of the order dated

12.01.2026, which reads as follows: "3. W.P.No.1160 of 2026 has been filed challenging the order of the 1st respondent in Lr.No.Affln.III(1)/4440/2025 dated

05.01.2026, and to quash the same, and further to direct the 1st respondent University to accept the necessary documents and the prescribed fees from the petitioner required for granting permission to increase the annual intake of seats in the existing course viz., BPT Course from 50 to 100 seats in the petitioner college, without insisting upon an order from the State Government, in line with the judgment in W.A.No.3534 of 2019 dated 16.06.2020, as confirmed in S.L.P.© No.16085 of 2020 dated

12.01.2021, and pass such further or other orders.

¶4The grievance of the petitioner College is that it is an existing institution already having an intake of 50 students per academic year in respect of the BPT course. The petitioner college has made arrangements for all the required infrastructure and the other facilities and has sought for increase in intake from 50 to 100 seats. However, the said request is not being considered by the 1st respondent university on the ground that, since the new Act has Page4 of 6 come into force, the new regulations have to be framed and until then, no admission can be made. This issue was the subject matter before the Division Bench of this Court in WA.Nos.3213, 3277 & 3678 of 2025 and W.P.No.40016 of 2025, and by judgment dated

02.12.2025, it was held that the permission need not be withheld for want of framing of regulations. Useful reference can be made to para Nos.36 and 37 of the said Judgment, wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench invoked the doctrine of necessity and directed the authorities to process the applications made by the existing institutions seeking additional intake in the existing course. Similarly, with reference to seeking 'No Objection Certificate', the same was the subject matter in W.P.No.28055 of 2025 dated

26.09.2025. A perusal of para Nos.6 and 7 of the said order would show that, in case of an existing institution, 'No Objection Certificate' or permission from the Government cannot be insisted upon.

¶5In view there of, the impugned order on the file of the 3rd respondent vide No.Z / 103 / 2024 - AHS - DOHFW Department dated 09.12.2024; letter No. e5426 / PME -2 / 2025-2 dated

26.06.2025 of the 5th respondent; Ref No. 064981 / PME / 2/ 2025 dated 18.07.2025 of the 6th Respondent and Lr.No.Affln.III(1)16106/2025 dated 23.07.2025 and Lr.No.Affln. III

(1)/4440 /2025 dated 05.01.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent respectively are quashed and these two Writ Petitions are allowed. The 1st respondent is directed to process the request of the petitioner for increase in intake from 50 to 100 seats in BPT course conducted in Maria College of Physiotherapy, Attoor, Thiruvattar Page5 of 6 Post, Kanyakumari District for the academic year 2025 – 2026 and pass orders thereon granting affiliation, if all other parameters are complied with. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of this order, without waiting for the certified copy of the order. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed."

¶4In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is allowed on the same terms as ordered in W.P.Nos.558 and 1160 of 2026. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order shl To

¶1The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University Rep by its Registrar, Anna Salai,Guindy, Chennai-600 032.

¶2The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort st. George, Chennai-600 009. WPoNo.o2627oofo2026 D.BHARATHAoCHAKRAVARTHY,oJ. shl WPoNo.o2627oofo2026oand WMP.No.2863oofo2026 23-01-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY WP No. 2627 of 2026 and WMP.No.2863 of 2026 Sree Abirami Charitable Trust Rep its Administrative Officer, Machegoundanpalayam, Seerapalayam Post, Coimbatore- 21. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University Rep by its Registrar, Anna Salai,Guindy, Chennai- 600 032. 2. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort st. George, Chennai- 600 009. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, calling for the records of Respondents relating to the order of the 1st Respondent in Lr.No. Affln. III (2)/ 16901/ 2025 dated 09.01.2026 and quash the same and directing the 1st respondent University to accept the necessary documents and the prescribed fees from the petitioner required for granting permission to increase in the annual intake of seats in the existing course Viz., BPT Course from 50 to 100 Seats in the Petitioners College Viz., Sree Abirami College of Physiotherapy, without insisting upon an order from the State Government in line with the Judgement in W.A. No. 3534 of 2019 dated Page2 of 6 16.06.2020 as confirmed in S.L.P. (C) NO.16085 of 2020 dated 12.01.2021. For Petitioner: Mr.Kandhan Duraisami For R1: For R2: Ms.C.Latharani Standing counsel for Tamil Nadu MGR Medical University Mr.E.Sundaram

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.