- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 January 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 2697/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
ORDER Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 31.10.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 06.06.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 31.10.2025.
¶4The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 15.07.2025,
24.07.2025 and 12.09.2025, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing fixed on 21.07.2025,
04.08.2025 and 15.09.2025. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.
¶5It is noticed that the Petitioner filed this Writ Petition on
22.01.2026, within the period of limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Assessment Order.
¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.
¶7Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 10% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.
¶8Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 06.06.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated
31.10.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 06.06.2025.
¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.
¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
28.01.2026 jas To: The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Office of the Assistant Commissioner, Omalur Assessment Circle, Salem.
C.SARAVANAN, J. jas and W.M.P.Nos.2949 and 2951 of 2026
28.01.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.01.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.2949 and 2951 of 2026 M/s.Venkateswara Blue Metals, Rep by its Proprietor - Venkatachalam Vadivel, No.325, Deevattipatti, Omalur, Salem – 636 351. ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Office of the Assistant Commissioner, Omalur Assessment Circle, Salem. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent the Impugned Order in GSTIN:33ADJPV1562G1ZH/2021-22 dated 31.10.2025 along with the consequential Order under Section 73 with Ref: ZD3310253871741 dated 31.10.2025 for the period 2021-22 to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.J.R.Devanand For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.