VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Akkim v. The State Rep.By Inspector of Police,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 February 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 2286/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to set aside the order dated

24.11.2025 passed in Crl.MP.No.985 of 2025 in Spl.S.C.No.26 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Erode and consequently, permit the petitioner to recall P.W-1 for cross-examination on material aspects.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was a consensual relationship between the petitioner and the victim. Subsequently, the petitioner also married the victim and the marriage has been registered. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court in Crl.O.P.No.19292 of 2025 to quash the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.26 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Erode, on the ground of compromise. This Court had dismissed the petition granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the trial Court in the pending case in Spl.S.C.No.26 of 2021. Immediately after the dismissal of the petition, the petitioner filed an application to recall and examine the victim. However, the learned trial Judge, finding that the petition has been filed belatedly and that the child victim cannot be repeatedly called for, for deposing evidence as per Section 33(5) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, dismissed the application. The petitioner, having been granted liberty in the quash petition, Page3 of 6 had filed an application seeking to recall. He further submitted that the victim has now attained majority and that though the victim has not supported the case of the prosecution before the trial Court in her examination, the fact of marriage between the petitioner and the victim has to be elicited before the Court and hence, her evidence is necessary for arriving at a just decision.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent submitted that the petitioner is the first accused. The learned trial Judge, finding that there had been a delay in filing the petition to recall and examine the victim and that the victim cannot be repeatedly called for for evidence, had dismissed the application. On instructions from Ms.A.Kalaiezhil, WGr-I, Erode AWPS, he submitted that the victim is living with the petitioner and they have also begotten children. He further submitted that now, the case stands posted on 05.02.2026.

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent and also perused the impugned order.

¶5Though this Court does not find any infirmity in the order impugned, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is said to have Page4 of 6 married the victim who had attained majority and they are living as husband and wife and also, they have begotten children through the wedlock, this Court is inclined to give one opportunity to the petitioner for cross-examine the witness.

¶6In view of the above, the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Erode, is directed to fix a date for appearance of P.W-1 and permit the petitioner to cross-examine her.

¶7With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SRM Note: Issue order copy on 04.02.2026 Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Erode.

¶2The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Erode, Erode District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o2286oofo2026 A.D.JAGADISHoCHANDIRA,oJ. SRM CRLoOPoNo.o2286oofo2026 04-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.1532 of 2026 R.Akkim ..Petitioner Vs 1. The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Erode, Erode District. 2. Xxxxx (Name Changed to XXXXX after marriage) W/o.XXXX, D/o.XXXX, Residing at No.XXX, XXXX XXX Street, Cr.No.24 of 2018. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to Crl.MP.No.985 of 2025 in Spl.S.C.No.26 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Erode, to set aside the order dated 24.11.2025 passed therein, consequently, permit recall of PW1 for limited cross-examination on material aspects. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aswath For Respondent-1 : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.