VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Surya v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 2121/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

13.10.2025, for the offence under Sections 302, 147, 148 and 120B in SC.No.535 of 2023, pending on the file of X Additional Session Judge, Chennai in connection with Crime No.82 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was earlier arrested and released on bail. Subsequently, due to his arrest in another case, the petitioner failed to appear before the concerned trial Court, and hence Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) was issued against him on 15.03.2025, and the same was executed on 13.10.2025.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was earlier arrested in this case and was regularly appearing before the Trial Court. Subsequently, he was arrested in another case and therefore, he was unable to appear before the Trial Court. He was thereafter produced before the concerned Court under a P.T. warrant, and the NBW was issued against him on 15.03.2025 and the same was executed on 13.10.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 13.10.2025. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner failed to appear before the concerned Court on 15.03.2025, pursuant to which a NBW was issued against him. He further submitted that the petitioner is having 8 previous cases and all the cases are 454 and 381of IPC. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the allegations, and the fact that the petitioner was earlier granted bail and subsequently arrested in another case, due to which he was unable to appear before the concerned Court, and also considering the period of his incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned X Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the Trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

03.02.2026 drl Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The X Additional Session Judge, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Mambalam GRP Police Station, Chennai District.

3.The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Chengalpet.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

K. RAJASEKAR, J. drl Crl.O.P.No.2121 of 2026 (2/2)

03.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.2121 of 2026 Surya ... Petitioner -vs- State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Mambalam GRP Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No.82 of 2023) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in SC.No.535 of 2023 pending on the file of X Additional Session Judge, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Samson For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.