VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Bharathi v. State Rep.By

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 February 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 3704/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.387 of 2023 pending on the file of the first respondent. Page2 of 4

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 29.06.2023, the first respondent police, while on patrol duty, received information about illegal transportation of sand. Acting upon the said information, they intercepted the petition's tipper lorry bearing Registration No.TN 19 AW 3184, which was allegedly transporting 4 units of gravel sand without any valid permit. Hence, a case was registered against the petitioner for illegal transportation of minerals.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was in possession of a valid permit to transport sand on the relevant date. Without verifying the same, the first respondent has registered the case against the petitioner. He further submitted that the first respondent police have no jurisdiction to register a case under Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act. Hence, the petitioner seeks quashment of the First Information Report against him.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent submitted that the petitioner's tipper lorry bearing Registration No.TN 19 AW 3184 was intercepted and found to be illegally transport four units of gravel sand, without any valid permit or Government Order and therefore, the first respondent Police registered the case. He further submitted that though the case has been registered for the offences under Sections 379 IPC and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, upon Page3 of 4 enquiry, the offence under Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act would be dropped, if not made out. He also submitted that the first respondent police are conducting investigation and if the petitioner is able to produce valid permits pertaining to the date of occurrence, the same would be duly considered and appropriate action would be taken in accordance with law.

¶5Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition stands closed, with a direction to the first respondent to file the final report within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to produce the original permits for the purpose of verification. 16-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VKR To

1.The Inspector of Police, Valangaiman Police Station, Tiruvarur District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o3704oofo2026 A.D.JAGADISHoCHANDIRA,oJ. VKR CRLoOPoNo.o3704oofo2026 16-02-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Bharathi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Valangaiman Police Station, Tiruvarur District. (Crime No.387 of 2023) 2. Kamaraj ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to call for the records relating to Crime No.387 of 2023 on the file of first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Samson For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.