- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 11094/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.The petitioner seeks for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition. She has given a representation on 17.11.2025 to the respondents seeking for issuance of patta in her name. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.R.Sreedhar, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if Page3 of 5 any or any other third party whom the respondents deem it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2025 seeking for issuance of patta in her name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after hearing the objections from the neighbouring land owners, if any or any other third party whom the respondents deem it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected WMP is closed. No costs. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA Page4 of 5 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To
¶1The chief Secretary Government of Puducherry, Secretariat, Beach Road, White Town, Puducherry-605 001.
¶2The Secretary (Revenue) Government of Puducherry, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Beach Road, White Town, Puducherry-605 001.
¶3The District Collector Union Territory of Puducherry, I-Floor, New Collectorate Building, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherry-605 009. 02-04-2026 Page5 of 5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Nalini ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The chief Secretary Government of Puducherry, Secretariat, Beach Road, White Town, Puducherry-605 001. 2. The Secretary (Revenue) Government of Puducherry, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Beach Road, White Town, Puducherry-605 001. 3. The District Collector Union Territory of Puducherry, I-Floor, New Collectorate Building, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherry-605 009. ..Respondent(s) Directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 17.11.2025 in seeking patta to her plot situated in Senbagaga nagar comprised in S.No.203 Thattanchavady revenue village pondicherry and pass orders within the time frame as may be fixed by this Honble court. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Ms.G.Sumitra For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sreedhar, AGP
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.