- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 March 2025
- Bench
- M. Sundar, S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- WP 10849/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow S Justice R. Kalaimathi
Judgment
ORDER [made by M. SUNDAR, J.] After some arguments, Mr. L.K. Manjunath, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'writ petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioner to file a contempt petition, if so advised and so desired qua order dated 25.05.2023 in W.P.No.16227 of 2023. This request is acceded to.
¶2Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: Page Nos.3/4
M.SUNDAR, J. and
R. KALAIMATHI, J. cad
¶3In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP stands disposed of as withdrawn/closed, albeit with preservation of rights of the writ petitioner in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (R.K.M., J.)
28.03.2025 cad Index : NC : To:
¶1The District Collector Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 606 601
¶2The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 606 101
¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 606 101
¶4The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk Office Vengikkal, Thiruvannamalai District 606 101
¶5The Block Development Officer (Block Panchayat) Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 606 601
¶6The President Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District Page Nos.4/4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI W.P.No.10849 of 2025 C. Leelavathi Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 606 601 2. The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 606 101 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 606 101 4. The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk Office Vengikkal Thiruvannamalai District 606 101 5. The Block Development Officer (Block Panchayat) Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 606 601 6. The President Thiruvannamalai Taluk Thiruvannamalai District Page Nos.1/4 7. Kasthuri (Councillor) Thiruvannamalai Taluk Thiruvannamalai District Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 especially the fifth respondent, to act on the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2024 by implementing the order dated 25.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16227 of 2023 in pursuance of the order dated 02.08.2023 passed by the first respondent under his proceedings dated 02.08.2023 vide Na.Ka.No.A2/1028567/2023 and thereby, forthwith removal of encroachments / illegal structures as constructed in the form of kitchen/cooking room in the water body (odai poramboke) which is comprised in S.F. No.67/2 of Samuthiram, Nallavanpalayam Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, put up by respondents 6 and 7 and to file an appropriate valid report by the fifth respondent towards the removal of the said encroachments and further, direct him to carry out periodic inspection and survey and to take all effective steps to ensure that the said water canal is free of encroachments of any nature in future. Page Nos.2/4 For petitioner Mr. L.K. Manjunath
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.