VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Ponmozhi v. The Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 April 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP 20105/2012

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking to quash the impugned proceedings and for a consequential direction to grant promotion to the petitioner on par with his juniors, with all attendant benefits.

¶2The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner entered service as a Helper in the Motor Vehicle Maintenance Department in the year 1979 and was subsequently promoted as Chargeman. The petitioner claims entitlement to promotion to the post of Foreman based on seniority. However, the second and third respondents, who are juniors to the petitioner, were promoted without adherence to the prescribed procedure and without preparation of a proper panel. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner had approached the Tribunal and thereafter, this Court, wherein a direction was issued to consider the petitioner's representation. Despite such directions, the first respondent issued the impugned panel and promotion orders in the year 2011 without extending the benefits to the petitioner. Challenging the same, the present Writ petition has been filed.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was aged about 57 years at the time of filing of the Writ Petition in the year Page3 of 4 2011. The prayer in the Writ Petition is to call for the final panel list dated

04.10.2011 and the consequential promotion order and to quash the same, and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Foreman with effect from 1986 by fixing his seniority appropriately.

¶4The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has already attained superannuation and is not aware whether all eligible pensionary benefits have been extended. If any pensionary benefits have not been extended to the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for appropriate relief.

¶5With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

K.SURENDER, J. 08-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JAI To The Director Motor Vehicle Maintenance Department, Velachery, Chennai 42 Page4 of 4

K.SURENDER, J. JAI

08-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER S.Ponmozhi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Director Motor Vehicle Maintenance Department, Velachery, Chennai 42 2. S. Chandrasekaran 3. T.Manoharan ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for the records of panel lists dt 4.10.2011 in Se.Mu. Order No. A4/6463/2011 and promotion order in Se.Mu.Order No. A4/6463/2011dt 4.11.2011 issued by the 1st respondent respectively and quash the same and consequentially issue direction directing the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner to the post of Foreman right from 1986 by fixing the petitioner seniority as Serial No.19, in the Foreman seniority list published by the 1st respondent in his reference No.A7/2981/89 dt 16.10.1990 and thereafter consequentially promote the petitioner to the post of Technical assistant by fixing the petitioner in the serial No.12 of the Technical Assistant Seniority list published by the 1st respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr,R.Marudhachalamurthy Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Dr.S.Suriya AGP for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.