P.Narayanan v. The Commissioner,

ORDER Mr.T.M. Rajangam, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 2nd respondent and Mr.A.C. Mani Bharathi, learned counsel takes notice for the 1st respondent. By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶2The relief sought in this writ petition is a direction to the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 18.09.2025 so as to finalise the audit paras if any and settle the same pending in Greater Chennai Corporation, within a reasonable period as may be fixed by this Court, considering the fact that the petitioner is due to retire on 30.06.2026.

¶3It is the case of the petitioner that he is presently working as Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Vellore Region, Vellore, is due to retire from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2026. The petitioner had earlier served as Municipal Commissioner in various Municipalities and also as Assistant Commissioner in the Greater Chennai Corporation during the years 2020–2021 in Zone VI and from 04.04.2025 to

21.04.2025 in Zone IV. In view of his impending retirement, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 18.09.2025 to the 1st respondent seeking furnishing of copies of audit paras, if any, pending against him or, in the Page3 of 5 alternative, issuance of a 'No Objection Certificate' certifying that no audit para is pending against him. Since no action has been taken, the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if this Court issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.09.2025, within a short time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that there are no adverse remarks as against the petitioner and that, if no audit objection is pending, the appropriate 'No Objection Certificate' will be issued by the 2nd respondent within a period to be fixed by this Court.

¶6Considering the limited relief sought, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.09.2025 and, if there are no adverse audit remarks pending against the petitioner, to issue the necessary 'No Objection Certificate', within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5

¶7With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

13.02.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VSI-2 To

¶1The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003.

¶2The Special Director of Local Fund Audit, No.571, Officers Building, Veterinary Hospital Campus, Opposite M C Raja Hostel, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. Page5 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J. vsi2

13.02.2026

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.02.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P. Narayanan … Petitioner vs. 1. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003. 2. The Special Director of Local Fund Audit, No.571, Officers Building, Veterinary Hospital Campus, Opposite M C Raja Hostel, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. … Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider my representation dated 18.09.2025 so as to finalise the audit paras if any and settle the same pending in Greater Chennai Corporation, within a reasonable period as may be fixed by this Court considering the fact that the petitioner is due to retire on 30.06.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.T.J. Lakshmipathy For Respondents : Mr.T.M. Rajangam Govt. Advocate for R2 Mr.A.C. Mani Bharathi for R1 Page2 of 5