VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Krishnakumar v. The State of Tamilnadu

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 February 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 4023/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation, dated 09.04.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioners have made representation, dated 09.04.2025 before the respondents seeking regularisation of services from their initial date of appointment in the second respondent University in the light of orders passed by this Court dated 23.03.2017 in W.P.No.7738 of 2012 etc., as well as the Page3 of 6 proceedings of the second respondent dated 25.10.2019 on par with similarly placed persons with all consequential service benefits including pensionary benefits. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.J.Janat Sharlee, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents 2 & 3.

¶4Though many grounds have been raised in this writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated

09.04.2025, as expeditiously as possible.

¶5Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 09.04.2025 will be considered and appropriate order will be passed within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page4 of 6

¶7Accordingly, the respondents are directed to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioners' representation, dated 09.04.2025, within a period of Twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 06-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page5 of 6 To:

¶1The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

¶2The Registrar, Periyar University, Salem-636 011, Salem District.

¶3The Secretary, Finance Committee, Periyar University, Salem -636 011. Page6 of 6

M.DHANDAPANI, J. VM 06-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI 1. A.Krishnakumar 2. V.Ravikumar 3. S.Milee 4. C.Suji Rampriya 5. D.Sivakumar 6. N.Senthil 7. M.Natesan 8. A.Chinnaraju 9. P.Elumalai 10.P.Uma ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Periyar University, Rep by its Registrar, Salem-636 011, Salem District. Page2 of 6 3. The Finance Committee, Rep by its Secretary, Periyar University, Salem -636 011. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners from their initial date of appointment in the 2nd respondent University in the light of orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 23.3.2017 in WP No.7738 of 2012 etc., as well as the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 25.10.2019 on par with similarly placed persons with all consequential service benefits including pensionary benefits. For Petitioner(s) : M.R.Jothimanian For Respondent(s) : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, AGP for R1 Mr.J.Janat Sharlee for M/s.Isaac Chamber for R2 & R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.