VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Prathap v. The State of Tamilnadu

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 February 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP 4671/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner asserts title under sale deed dated 20.03.2007 bearing Document No.3808 of 2007 in respect of 1800 sq.ft in Plot No.73. Tracing title from one Arumugam, it is further asserted that the legal heirs of Arumugam filed W.A.No.1194 of 2018, which was allowed on 22.08.2023. On the ground that the lands currently owned by the petitioner forms part of the larger extent covered by the order of the Division Bench, the petitioner seeks consideration of the request for release of lands from proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978. Page3 of 5

¶2Mr.Abishek Murthy, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for all the respondents. He submits that the petitioner's representation would be considered and disposed of on merits within two months by the third respondent.

¶3The petitioner relies upon order dated 22.08.2023 in W.A.No.1194 of 2018 on the basis that 5862 sq.ft. purchased by him under sale deed dated

10.07.2006 forms part of the larger extent covered by the judgment of the Division Bench. This aspect has to be verified by the third respondent while considering the representation of the petitioner. If it transpires that it is covered, the judgment of the Division Bench would hold the field and the petitioner would be entitled to the relief claimed.

¶4With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of by directing the third respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 22.10.2025 by taking note of the observations in this order. There will be no order as to costs. 19-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RNA Page4 of 5 To

¶1The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government Revenue Department Ulc-1(1) Wing Fort St.George, Chennai 600009.

¶2The Commissioner Land Reforms/Urban Land Ceiling And Urban Land Tax Ezhilagam, Chennai 600005.

¶3The Assistant Commissioner Urban Land Tax, Kundrathur Zone @183 Karuneegar Street, Adambakkam Chennai 600088.

¶4The Tahsildar Kundrathur Tlauk Office Mehta Nagar Main Rd Kundrathur Chennai 600069. WPoNo.o4671oofo2026 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. RNA WPoNo.o4671oofo2026 19-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY K.Prathap S/O.Kondapalli Guruvaiah Flat No.3 Swagruha C Block H.No.2-22-267/G3, Bhagyanagar Colony Hyderabad 500072. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government Revenue Department Ulc-1(1) Wing Fort St.George, Chennai 600009. 2. The Commissioner Land Reforms/Urban Land Ceiling And Urban Land Tax Ezhilagam, Chennai 600005. 3. The Assistant Commissioner Urban Land Tax, Kundrathur Zone @183 Karuneegar Street, Adambakkam Chennai 600088. 4. The Tahsildar Kundrathur Tlauk Office Mehta Nagar Main Rd Kundrathur Chennai 600069. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondent to give effect to the order dated 22.08.2023 passed by the Honble Madras High Court in WA.No. 1194 of 2018 and release the lands from proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 and consequently direct the 4th respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioners. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Subhadra Madhavan For Respondent(s): Mr.Abishek Murthy, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.