VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Red Flame Media v. The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax),

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 6611/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned ex parte Order dated 12.03.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 24.01.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Order ex parte dated 12.03.2025.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 17.02.2026.

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the disputed tax amount has already been recovered from the petitioner, as Page3 of 6 evidenced from the electronic liability ledger. It is seen that on 11.07.2025, a sum of Rs.2,06,516/- has been debited towards the outstanding demand under the CGST head.

¶6Considering the fact that the impugned order has been passed exparte and further taking into account that the substantial portion of the disputed tax has already been recovered, this Court is inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

¶7Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.03.2025 is quashed and the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law.

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 24.01.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

12.03.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 24.01.2025.

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, Page4 of 6 the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶10In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶11Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶12This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

25.02.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kmm Page5 of 6 To The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Porur Assessment Circle, Poonamallee Zone, Kancheepuram Division, Chennai - 600123. Page6 of 6

C.SARAVANAN, J. kmm W.P.No.6611 of 2026

25.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.02.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN W.P.No.6611 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.7176 & 7177 of 2026 M/s. RED FLAME MEDIA, Represented by its partner, Mr.Jeevarathinam Kathiravan, No.10, NA, Balaji Avenue, Alapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600116. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Porur Assessment Circle, Poonamallee Zone, Kancheepuram Division, Chennai - 600123. ..Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Respondent in the impugned ex-parte Order No. ZD330325091849Z dated 14.03.2025 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and it has been passed in contravention of principles of natural justice and treat the impugned proceedings as under Section 73 instead of Section 74 of the TNGST / CGST Act, 2017. For Petitioner : Mr.Thyagarajan K For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader. Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.