- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 February 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 4287/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his representation dated 20.12.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.The petitioner had submitted his representation dated 20.12.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Mr.R.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the third respondent. Since no adverse order is being passed against respondents 4 to 7, notice to respondents 4 to 7 is dispensed with by this Court.
4.No prejudice will be caused to the first respondent if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from respondents 4 to 7 as well as any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to respondents 4 to 7 and also to any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the second respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the first respondent, the third respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 16-02-2026 vga To
1.The Tahsildar The Tahsildar office Shoolagiri -635 117 Krishnagiri District
2.The Head surveyor The Tahsildar office. shollagiri-635 117 Krishangiri District
3.The Inspector of police Shollagiri Police st ation Shollagiri-635 117 Krishnagiri District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga
16-02-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sivasankar Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar The Tahsildar office Shoolagiri -635 117 Krishnagiri District 2.The Head surveyor The Tahsildar office. shollagiri-635 117 Krishangiri District 3.The Inspector of police Shollagiri Police st ation Shollagiri-635 117 Krishnagiri District 4.Basavaraj 5.Thimojiamma 6.Anjalamma 7.Venkatalakshmi Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct the survey of the land measuring an extent of 0.14.00 Hectare in survey No.86/4A 0.13.00 Hecate in survey No.86/4B, 0.16.50 Hectare in Survey No.86/4C and 0.22.50 Hectare in survey No.87/3E sit uated at chennappali village, shollagiri Taluk, KRishangiri District and demarcate the boundaries by availaging the assistance of the 3rd respondent in the event of any obstruction from the private respondents based on the petitioners representation dated 20.12.2025 within a time period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 and R2 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R3 ND/W - R4 to R7 -Pvt
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.