Tvl Sm Steels v. The State Tax Officer

O R D E R Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 23.06.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 08.04.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 23.06.2025.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 30.01.2026.

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.

¶6Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

¶7Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 08.04.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

23.06.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 08.04.2025.

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

03.02.2026 nvi To: The State Tax Officer, Peelamedu North Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.

C.SARAVANAN, J. nvi W.P.No.3457 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.3887 and 3889 of 2026

03.02.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3887 and 3889 of 2026 Tvl.SM STEELS, Rep.by its Proprietor Mr.Muthusamy Sanjeevi, 453, Ramasamy Naidu Layout, Ellaithottam Road, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu – 641 004. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer, Peelamedu North Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Impugned Assessment Order in Ref.No.ZD330625240741K dated 23.06.2025 under Section 74 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 and uploaded the same along with the summary of order in DRC07 for the Financial Year 2022-23 from the files of the respondent herein, quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.Aparna Nandakumar For Respondent : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate ***********