- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 February 2026
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP 6224/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.T. Asha
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to dispose the representation dated 26/12/2025, within a time period as fixed by this Court.
¶2The petitioner owns a Nanjai land measuring an extent of 10 Ares in Murungai Village, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District comprised in S.No.179/4C1. The petitioner submits that there are about 41 Palymyra trees in his patta land, which have resulted in the growth of bushes, preventing him from carrying out agricultural activities. Further, as the petitioner's land lies along the road side, other land owners use his land as a pathway for carrying out the agricultural activities. However, due to the Palymyra trees, access to adjoining lands is obstructed. Therefore, he made representations to the respondents on 26.12.2025 and 08.01.2026, but the same were not considered by the Tahsildar Arakkonam.
¶3It is also noted that a similar representation by one P.Shanmugam, whose land lies behind the petitioner's property, was considered by the second respondent and he had directed the Tahsildar to take appropriate steps for cutting the Palmyra trees. However, no action has been taken so far. Page3 of 5
¶4Heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record:
¶5It is seen that the Tahsildar, Arakkonam was earlier directed by the District Revenue Officer to consider the representation of P.Shanmugam dated
09.02.2024, regarding cutting of Palmyra trees, but no action was taken. Similarly, the representations made by the petitioner have also not been considered by the respondents.
¶6In view of the above, this Court directs the Tahsildar, Arakkonam, to take steps to remove the Palmyra trees in the petitioner's land within a period of four weeks from today. In the event that the Tahsildar fails to comply with this direction, the petitioner shall be deemed to have the approval to cut the Palmyra trees.
¶7Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. 23-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order PVS Page4 of 5 To
¶1The District Collector, O/o.District Collector Office, Ranipet District, Ranipet.
¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.
¶3The Tahsildar, O/o.Tahsildar Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. Page5 of 5
P.T.ASHA, J. PVS 23-02-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA N.Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, O/o.District Collector Office, Ranipet District, Ranipet. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. 3. The Tahsildar, O/o.Tahsildar Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose the representation dated 26/12/2025, within a time period as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Parameshwaran For Respondent(s): Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, SGP Page2 of 5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.