VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Sarasu v. The State Represented by Its

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 February 2025
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor, N.Senthilkumar
Case no.
WP 4304/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.S. RameshFollow N.Senthilkumar

Judgment

ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR

, J.

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order bearing No.22545 / Tha.Ku3 / 2024, dated 24.12.2024, passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consecutively direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the detenu, Arumugam, S/o.Perumal, aged about 39 years, Convict No.23132, detained at Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the sister of the life convict, a representation was sent to the respondents by the petitioner seeking 30 days ordinary leave to the her brother to sell their property and to disburse their shares, as their parents are suffering from ailments, they need to make financial arrangements. The petitioner is having two children and they are struggling for their day to day expenses. Hence, his presence has become essential for them to dispose of their ancestral property and to settle the family members who are in below poverty line. The representation dated 27.11.2024 seeking ordinary leave for 30 days was rejected by the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Coimbatore Range No.1253/AA2/2024 dated 19.12.2024. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶3Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced a report of the Probation Officer dated 10.02.2025, wherein the probation officer has stated that the reason given in the petitioner's representation dated

27.11.2024 is genuine. The Probation Officer has also stated that the representation was rejected by the Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Coimbatore Range. He has also stated that Crl.A.No.369 of 2023 is pending before the High Court, hence, he is not eligible for ordinary or emergency leave as per Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rule 1982 Rule No.2(4).

¶4Since the Probation Officer has recommended for grant of ordinary leave to the convict prisoner, this Court is inclined to direct the respondents to grant 21 days ordinary leave to the convict prisoner. Accordingly, the impugned order bearing No.22545 / Tha.Ku3 / 2024, dated 24.12.2024, passed by the 3rd respondent is hereby quashed.

¶5This Writ Petition stands allowed accordingly. There shall be a direction to the respondents herein, to grant 21 days ordinary leave "without escort" to the life convict viz. Arumugam, S/o.Perumal, CT No.337190, commencing from 08.03.2025 to 28.03.2025, with a condition that the life convict shall report before the Illupur Police Station, daily at 10.30 a.m. After expiry of the Ordinary Leave, the life convict shall surrender before the Jail Authorities on 29.03.2025 before

10.00 a.m. The prisoner shall utilize the leave only for the purpose for which it has been granted and shall not indulge in any other activities.

¶6With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs.

[M.S.R, J.] [N.S, J.]

28.02.2025 Index : Yes / No kas Note: Issue Order Copy on 07.03.2025 To.

1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu Home (Prison IV) Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009

2.The Director Inspector General of Prison Coimbatore Range Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore 641 018

3.The Superintendent Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore 641 018

M.S.RAMESH, J. and

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. kas

4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai

28.02.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.02.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Sarasu ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by its 1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu Home (Prison IV) Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009 2.The Director Inspector General of Prison Coimbatore Range Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore 641 018 3.The Superintendent Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore 641 018 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order bearing No.22545 / Tha.Ku3 / 2024, dated 24.12.2024, passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consecutively direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the detenu, Arumugam, S/o.Perumal, aged about 39 years, Convict No.23132, detained at Central Prison, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.