Jaibavani R v. Income Tax Officer

ORDER Mr.B.Ramana Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.

¶3The Petitioner is the wife of late Muthya Nadar Ramamurthy who died on 12.06.2025. The Petitioner has challenged the impugned Assessment order dated 26.03.2024 within the prescribed time, in her capacity as the legal heir / legal representative of the deceased assessee viz., Muthya Nadar Ramamurthy, who had been suffering from mental illness prior to his demise.

¶4The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner being the legal heirs / legal representative of the deceased assessee, may be given an opportunity to explain the case afresh from the stage of Section 148 Notice dated 01.04.2022, which had been issued under the new regime in the name of the deceased assessee.

¶5The submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner appears to be reasonable.

¶6The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent submits that appropriate orders may be passed securing the interest of the Revenue.

¶7Although the impugned assessment order has been passed prior to the death of the deceased assessee viz., Muthya Nadar Ramamurthy, the medical records filed before this Court indicate that Petitioner's husband was suffering from mental illness and eventually died due to various other health conditions.

¶8Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned assessment order is quashed and the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh assessment order on merits from the stage of Section 148 Notice after hearing the Petitioner.

¶9The Petitioner as also the other legal heirs, shall comply with all the other requirement under Section 159 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the rules made thereunder and shall participate in the denovo adjudication.

¶10The Respondent shall thereafter pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law.

¶11Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶12This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

04.02.2026 jas To: The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Tiruvallur.

C.SARAVANAN, J. jas and W.M.P.Nos.4111 and 4113 of 2026

04.02.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.4111 and 4113 of 2026 R.Jaibavani ... Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Tiruvallur. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order in assessment order in DIN.ITBA/AST/S/147/2023- 24/1063397334(1) dated 26.03.2024 passed by the Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramana Kumar Senior Standing Counsel