VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

N.Parvatha Varthini v. The Accountant General (A and E),

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 February 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 4783/2026

Judgment

ORDER

Ms. G. Vardhini Karthik, learned counsel takes notice for the 1st respondent and Mr.K. Tippusulthan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 2 and 3. By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶2The relief sought in this writ petition is a direction to the 3rd respondent herein to forward the original Service Register along with Revised Pension Proposal of petitioner's husband Late.V.Rajasekaran, through the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent so as to enable the petitioner to receive the revised pension and revised family pension and for issuance of consequential directions to the 1st respondent.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's late husband V. Rajasekaran, entered service in the year 1968 and retired on

30.04.2006 as Multi Purpose Health Supervisor (Special Grade). After his retirement, he was receiving pension till his demise on 12.12.2023. Thereafter, the petitioner, being the widow, is in receipt of family pension. He further submitted that a proposal was also forwarded by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent on 25.07.2025 with regard to revision of petitioner's pension for the period from 22.03.1989 to 30.04.2006. However, the said proposal has not been implemented till date. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate direction. Therefore, he prayed for issuance of appropriate directions in this regard.

¶4Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 submitted that the 1st respondent will consider and implement the proposal, if it is otherwise in order, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5In view of the above submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the proposal dated 25.07.2025 forwarded by the 2nd respondent and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law for implementation, if the petitioner is otherwise entitled, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

13.02.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2 To

¶1The Accountant General (A and E), Office of the Principal Accountant General General Accounts and Entitlements Tamilnadu, Annasalai, Teynampet Chennai 600 018.

2.The Block Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Centre, Kollumedu, Thiruvallur District 600 062.

3.The District Health Officer, O/o.District Health Office Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur.

M.DHANDAPANI, J. vsi2

13.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI N.Parvatha Varthini Petitioner Vs 1. The Accountant General (A and E), Office of the Principal Accountant General General Accounts and Entitlements Tamilnadu, Annasalai, Teynampet Chennai 600 018. 2.The Block Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Centre, Kollumedu, Thiruvallur District 600 062. 3.The District Health Officer, O/o.District Health Office Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent herein to forward the original Service Register along with Revised Pension Proposal of petitioner's husband Late.V.Rajasekaran, through 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent so as to enable the petitioner to receive the revised pension and revised family pension and consequently direct the 1st respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.A. Tamilvannan For Respondents : Ms.G. Vardhini Karthik for R1 Mr.K. Tippusulthan Govt. Advocate for R2 & R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.