VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Senthil Kumar v. The Thasildhar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 4870/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his representation dated 21.04.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner had submitted his representation on 21.04.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the second respondent. Since no adverse order is being passed against the respondents 3 and 4, notice to respondents 3 & 4 is dispensed with by this Court.

4.No prejudice will be caused to the first respondent if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from respondents 3 and 4 as well as any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to respondents 3 and 4 and also any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the first respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the first respondent, the second respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 16-02-2026 vga To

1.The Thasildhar Taluk office, Perur, Coimbatore District

2.The Inspector of Police Perur Police station, Coimbatore District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga

16-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Senthil Kumar Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Thasildhar Taluk office, Perur, Coimbatore District 2.The Inspector of Police Perur Police station, Coimbatore District 3.Sivakami 4.Sivakumar Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the 1st respondent to survey the petitioners land and fix the boundary stone around his land comprised in Survey Nos (1) 119/2B with new subdivision No. 119/ 2B3C to an extent of 0.33 1/2 cents, (2) 119/2B with new subdivision No. 119/2B3D to an extent of 0.03 3/4 cents (3) 126/2 with new subdivision No. 126/2B4 to an extent of 0.17 cents (4) 126/2 with new Sub Division No. 126/2C2 to an extent of 0.05 cents situated at Thenkarai Village, Perur Taluk, Coimbatore District and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection to survey the land. For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R2 ND/W - R3 and R4 -Pvt

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.