VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Ravichandran v. The Tahsidlar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 4251/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted a representation dated 28.05.2025 seeking for survey and demarcation of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 6, notice to them in this writ petition is dispensed with.

¶4No prejudice will be caused to the first respondent, if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with Page3 of 4 law, after hearing the objections if any from the respondents 4 to 6 as well as any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the land in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 to 6, and also to any other party, whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the first respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If any need arises, the first respondent is permitted to submit a petition for police assistance, and upon receipt of such request, the concerned jurisdictional police shall render necessary police assistance for conducting survey and demarcation of the subject property. No Costs. 17-02-2026 RKM Page4 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM To

¶1The Tahsidlar Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri district

¶2The Head Surveyor Taluk office, Krishnagiri district

¶3The Inspector of Police C-3 Police Station, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri district 635 206 17-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE V.Ravichandran ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsidlar Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri district 2. The Head Surveyor Krishnagiri district. 3. The Inspector of Police C-3 Police Station, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri district 635 206 4. Rukmani 5. Prabhukumar 6. Gowtham ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to act upon the petitioner's online application dated 04.07.2025 and to conduct the survey of the land admeasuring an extent of 4200 sq.m, comprised in Plot Nos.35 and 36 in Survey No.488 situated at Jampukuttapatti Village, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri district and demarcate the boundaries by availing the assistant of the 3rd respondent in the event of any obstruction from Page2 of 4 the respondents 4 to 6 and erect fencing at the cost of the petitioner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 13.02.2025 and 28.05.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Kritheeshwaran For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, GA (R1 & R2) Mr.R.Venkatesaperumal, GA (Crl.Side) (R3)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.