VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sudhir Reddy Rebala v. The Inspector of Police,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 June 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 249/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to execute the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the accused in PRC No.24 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tiruporur. Page2 of 4

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶3The petitioner lodged a complaint against the accused. After completion of the investigation, a final report was filed. Now, the case is pending for committal in PRC No.24 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tiruporur, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 339 and 359 of IPC. However, the accused failed to appear before the Trial Court and as such, the learned Magistrate issued a Non-Bailable Warrant against the accused and the same is pending for execution.

¶4In the meantime, the accused, who is none other than the petitioner's wife, approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by filing Transfer Petition (Criminal) No.200 of 2026, seeking transfer of PRC No.24 of 2024 from the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tiruporur, to the file of the Judicial Magistrate, South East Delhi, Saket Courts, New Delhi. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dismissed the said transfer petition by order dated 29.05.2026.

¶5In view of the pendency of the said transfer petition, the respondent could not able to execute the warrant issued against the accused. Now, the transfer petition has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, Page3 of 4 there is no legal impediment for the respondent to execute the Non-Bailable Warrant.

¶6In view of the above, the respondent is directed to execute the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the accused in PRC No.24 of 2024 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the respondent while executing the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the accused by furnishing the correct address of the accused.

¶7With the above direction, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands disposed of. No costs. 30-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order LPP To

1.The District cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruporur.

2.The Inspector of Police, T-19, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J. LPP 30-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Sudhir Reddy Rebala ..Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, T-19, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chennai. ..Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, or direction or order to direct the respondent to execute the NBW warrant against the accused in PRC.No.24 of 2024 and issue look out notice to the accused in PRC.No.24 of 2024 pending on the file of the District cum Judicial Magistrate at Thiruporur in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner: Mr.T.Balaji For Respondent: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.