Udhagai Sutrula Car/ Sumo Ottunargal v. The Joint Secretary (T)

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to forbear the third respondent herein from insisting for fitment of Speed Limiting Devices in the Four Wheelers belonging to the Members of the petitioner's Association, whose list is appended as Annexure to the writ petition, as per Proviso (iv) to Rule 118 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

¶2According to the petitioner, the petitioner's Association is a registered association under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1978 to cater the protection and welfare of its members who are running cab services. Proviso

(iv) of Rule 118 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 stipulates that Speed Limiting devices is exempted for four wheelers which are used for carriage of passengers and their luggage, with seating capacity not exceeding eight passengers in addition to driver seat and not exceeding 3500 kilogram gross vehicle weight. Though the petitioner's association is exempted from fixing Speed Limiting Devices in the cars / Sumo in hill areas as per the said proviso, however without considering the petitioner's representation, the third respondent insisted the petitioner's association to fit the Speed Limiting Device, which is contrary to the aforementioned rules. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed seeking the aforesaid relief. Page3 of 4

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that no representation has been given to the third respondent / Regional Transport Officer and if any representation is submitted before him, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 and the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the limited relief sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation as per the existing Rules and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and aggrieved persons, if any on merits and in accordance with law.

¶6With the above observation and directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order rap Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. rap To

¶1The Joint Secretary (T) North Transport, Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶2The Principal Secretary, Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

¶3The Regional Transport Officer, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District. 16-04-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.No.8364 of 2020 Udhagai Sutrula Car / Sumo Ottunargal Nala Sangam Rep. by its President S.Govarthan, No. 8B, Dr.Ambedkar Street, Kandal, Finger Post, Udhagamandalam, Pin - 643 006 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Joint Secretary (T) North Transport Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. The Principal Secretary Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005 3. The Regional Transport Officer Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus forbearing the 3rd Respondent herein from insisting for fitment of Speed Limiting Devices in the Four Wheelers belonging to the Members of the petitioner's Association, whose list is appended as Annexure to the writ petition, as per Proviso (iv) to Rule 118 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. For Petitioner(s): Ms.J.Swetha for Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondent(s): Mrs.S.Anitha, Spl.GP. Mr.R.Rajesh Vivekananthan, Deputy Solicitor General of India for R1 Page2 of 4