Moutheeshkumar v. The Managing Director

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to drop the proposal of establishing the TASMAC Shop at the place, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

2.The petitioner's grievance is that if the TASMAC Shop is allowed to be opened at the place, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, it will cause nuisance to the persons residing in that area. The petitioner therefore has given representations to the respondents not to open the TASMAC Shop at Page3 of 6 the place, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representations were not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.M.Sekar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Mr.P.Ananada Kumar, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 3 to 5.

4.As seen from the representations given by the petitioner, there is no acknowledgment produced by the petitioner before this Court. In view of the same, the petitioner will have to submit a fresh representation to the respondents.

5.No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the third respondent requesting the third respondent to drop the proposal of establishing the TASMAC Shop at the place, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation within the stipulated time, the third respondent shall pass Page4 of 6 final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks thereafter. No costs. 04-02-2026 VGA Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, TASMAC, Egmore Chennai 600008.

¶2The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC Ltd), TASMAC Limited, Bhavani main Road, Suriyampalayam Erode 638316.

¶3The Collector Erode District, Erode.

¶4The tahsildar Erode, Erode District.

¶5The Superintendent Of Police Erode, Erode District. WPoNo.o3774oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. VGA WPoNo.o3774oofo2026 04-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Moutheeshkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, TASMAC, Egmore Chennai 600008. 2. The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC Ltd), TASMAC Limited, Bhavani main Road, Suriyampalayam Erode 638316. 3. The Collector Erode District, Erode. 4. The tahsildar Erode, Erode District. Page2 of 6 5. The Superintendent Of Police Erode, Erode District. ..Respondent(s) Directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 03.02.2024, 05.10.2025 and 10.10.2025 and direct the respondents to drop the proposal of establishing the TASMAC Shop at SP Goundanur, Boothapadi Village, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Narayanan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sekar,SC For R1 & R2 Mr.P.Anandakumar Govt Advocate For R3 to R5