- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 7859/2026
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his on-line application dated 16.06.2025 and also for fencing the agriculture land with the assistance of the 2nd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on
16.06.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.
4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 1st respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Even though the petitioner has sought for a direction to give protection to Page2 of 4 the petitioner for fencing the property, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit on instructions that the petitioner is not pressing for the said relief now. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 1st respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the 1st respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the 1st respondent, the 2nd respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.
(d) There shall be no order as to costs. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA Page3 of 4
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To
¶1The Tashildhar Tirupatthur Taluk Tirupatthur District.
¶2The Inspector Of Police Irunapattu Police Station Tirupatthur District. 03-03-2026 Page4 of 4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Jagan S/o.Raja No.83 Yekkur Village Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tashildhar Tirupatthur Taluk Tirupatthur District. 2. The Inspector Of Police Irunapattu Police Station Tirupatthur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to dispose of petitioners Application 2025/0123/36/004448 dated 16.06.2025 to survey the land in the Irunapattu Survey No. 15/1,15/2A, 16/1B 18/3A and 18/3B an extent of property over 0-4.50, 0-32.00, 0-3.00 0-21.00, 0-26.50 and 0-35.00 respectively in Tirupattur Taluk and District and mark the boundaries based on the meats and bounds for fencing the agriculture land along with the necessary and appropriate police protection. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam, Government Advocate (For R1) Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (for R2) Page1 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.