VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jayalakshmi v. The Thasildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 4285/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted a representation dated 21.01.2026 seeking for survey and demarcation of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent in this writ petition is dispensed with.

¶4No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 1 and 2, if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with Page3 of 4 law, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom the respondents 1 and 2 deem fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the land in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom the respondents 1 and 2 deem fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If any need arises, the first respondent is permitted to submit a petition for police assistance, and upon receipt of such request, the third respondent police shall render necessary police assistance for conducting survey and demarcation of the subject property. No Costs. 13-02-2026 RKM Page4 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM To

¶1The Thasildar Pochampalli Taluk, krishnagiri District

¶2The Head surveyor Pochampalli Taluk, Krishngiri District

¶3The inspector of Police Barur police station Krishnagiri District 13-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Jayalakshmi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Thasildar Pochampalli Taluk, krishnagiri District 2. The Head surveyor Pochampalli Taluk, Krishngiri District 3. The inspector of Police Barur police station Krishnagiri District. 4. Ponnammal ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to survey the measurement of petitioner properties by fixing the boundary stone and fencing for a properties comprised in Patta No.604, survey no 275/2 measuring to an extent of 0.18.52 cent situated at bendarahalli village Pochampalli Taluk, krishangiri Distrct with 4th respondent police aid for survey of field measurement and fixing boundary stone and fencing the petitioner property in pursuant to petitioner representation dated 21.01.2026 Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Dasarathan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, GA (R1 & R2) Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, GA(Crl.Side) For R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.