- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 February 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 5027/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had submitted an online application on 05.03.2024 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. Mr.R.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent.
4.No prejudice will be caused to respondents 2 and 3 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners and any other party as they deem it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, second respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom the second respondent deems it fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the third respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the second respondent, the fourth respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 18-02-2026 vga To
1.The District collector office of the Collectorate, Namakkal District.
2.The Tahsildar Office of Tahsildar Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District.
3.the Head Surveyor Office of Tahsildar Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District.
4.the Inspector of police Elachipalayam Police Station, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga
18-02-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.Meiyazhagan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector office of the Collectorate, Namakkal District. 2.The Tahsildar Office of Tahsildar Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. 3.the Head Surveyor Office of Tahsildar Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. 4.the Inspector of police Elachipalayam Police Station, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the 2nd and 3rd respondent to measure the petitioners land property and fix boundary stones in Survey No.228/3A2 totally to an extent of about 0- 71.50 area (Hec/Ares) in Peiryamanali Village, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal district with aid of the 4th respondent by Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District with aid of the 4th respondent by disposing of the petitioners online application 05.03.2024 vide petition No.2024/ 0123/ 09/ 00560 and online application dated 29.01.2026 vide petition No.2026/0123/09/00254 and the same within a time to be stipulated by this Honourable Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Rajakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate For R1 to R3 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.