VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Kanakamma, v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 4462/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to re-classify the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as patta land and thereafter, issue patta in the name of the petitioner, based on her representation, dated 29.12.2025.

¶2The petitioner claims that she is in possession of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition for a long number of years. The petitioner seeks for re-classifaction of the subject property as patta land of the petitioner. The petitioner also seeks for issuance of patta in her name for the subject property. The petitioner had given a representation on 29.12.2025 to the respondents for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Page No.2 of 6

¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation, dated 29.12.2025 seeking for re-classification of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as patta land and thereafter, issue patta in the name of the petitioner for the subject property, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page No.3 of 6

¶7With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

10.02.2026 Index : Yes / No (7/9) Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri Taluk.

4.The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

10.02.2026 (7/9) Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Kanakamma ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri Taluk. 4.The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to reclassify the property comprised in Survey No.498 at measuring about 1.39 acres, situated at Mookandapalli, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District from Kallakuthu (Stony Ground) to Sarkar Page No.1 of 6 Poramboke (Residential Category) and consequently issue patta in the petitioner name for the extent of 5 cents, by considering her representation dated 29.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.