VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

M.Edward Raj v. Chairman-Cum-Managing

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 January 2025
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP 6410/2018

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Battu Devanand

Judgment

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, as per the Time Bound Promotion Scheme, a person who has served for the qualifying years in one grade should travel to the next / higher grade in the category. The petitioner was due for promotion to the grade of APO (SG2) in the year 2010. However, due to the reason that the petitioner was suspended from service at that relevant point of time, he was not considered for the promotion. Later, all charges were dropped. As such, the petitioner is eligible for promotion as APO (SG2) with effect from 2010 and for other subsequent promotion as per the Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Accordingly, the petitioner submits a representation dated 02.08.2017 to the respondents, requesting to consider him for time bound promotions. But no orders passed by the respondents on the said representation. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not passing the orders on the representation dated 02.08.2017 submitted by the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed.

¶3Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner already retired from service on attaining superannuation and all retirement benefits are paid to him and as such, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition.

¶4Having considered the submissions of the respective counsel, in view of the fact that the main relief sought in this writ petition is with regard to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 02.08.2017 by the second respondent only, in our considered view, it is appropriate to dispose of this writ petition without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 02.08.2017 submitted by the petitioner to meet the ends of justice.

¶5Accordingly this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 02.08.2017 in accordance with law, within a period of eighth weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶6There shall be no order as to costs.

20.01.2025 Index :Yes/No AT To

1.The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801.

2.The General Manager (HR), Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801.

3.The Chief Manager, Personnel and Administrative Department, Central Workshop & Service, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801.

4.The Deputy General Manager, Personnel and Administrative Department, Central Workshop & Service, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. AT

20.01.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND M. Edward Raj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801. 2.General Manager (HR), Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801. 3.Chief Manager, Personnel and Administrative Department, Central Workshop & Service, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801. 4.Deputy General Manager, Personnel and Administrative Department, Central Workshop & Service, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Block – 1, Neyveli – 607 801. ... Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 02.08.2017 by granting Time Bound Promotion to the petitioner from JAO (WS) to Assistant Administrative Officer/Assistant Personnel Officer (APO-SG2) w.e.f. 2010 and other subsequent promotion as Assistant Executive Manager / Administrative Officer (AEM) (one year training period included) – (E2 – Grade) w.e.f. 2015 and consequentially grant all monetary benefits and back wages and refix the petitioner's pay scale within a time frame as may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. G.V. Shoba For Respondents : Mr. N. Nithianandam

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.