- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 February 2026
- Bench
- K.Rajasekar
- Case no.
- CRL OP 2982/2026
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
26.01.2026, for the offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(a), 4(1-A) of TN Prohibition Act, 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 and 123 of BNS, 2023 in Crime No34 of 2026, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
¶2The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were found in possession of 5.4 kgs of tobacco products and 180 ml of 25 liquor bottles. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioners.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.
¶5Considering the the nature of offence and taking into account the period of incarceration and the fact that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions:
¶6Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Xth Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioners shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [d] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [e] the petitioners to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
10.02.2026 kmm Note :
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The Xth Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai.
¶2The Inspector of Police, P-2, Otteri Police Station, Chennai.
¶3The Superintendent, Women's Central Prison, Puzhal.
¶4The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal – II, Chennai.
¶5The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
K.RAJASEKAR, J. kmm Crl.O.P.No.2982 of 2026
10.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.2982 of 2026 1. Vijayalakshmi 2. Babu ... Petitioners Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, P-2, Otteri Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.34 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused on bail in Crime No.34 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Praveen Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.