- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 February 2026
- Bench
- T. Vinod Kumar
- Case no.
- WP 4896/2021
Follow Madras High CourtFollow T. Vinod Kumar
Judgment
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and perused the records.
¶2The petitioner by the present writ petition has assailed the action of the second respondent in issuing the impugned charge memo dated 30.12.2020 and proceeding further on the basis of the aforesaid charge memo.
¶3When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents submit that pursuant to the aforesaid charge memo issued, the respondent authorities had appointed an enquiry officer, who had conducted enquiry and submitted a report; and that based on the said report, further action is to be taken.
¶4Since, it is now stated into this Court that the petitioner having submitted to the jurisdiction of the enquiry officer and having submitted explanation, which has been considered by the enquiry officer who is stated to have submitted a report and is pending consideration for passing final orders by the second respondent, this Court is of the view that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration, as it is now stated that the respondent authorities would be taking further action based on the enquiry report. It is made clear that in the event of the respondents passing any adverse order against the petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to avail further remedies open to him in accordance with law.
¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
11.02.2026 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh To
¶1The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
¶2The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Tea Plantation Corporation Ltd., TANTEA, Coonoor, The Nilgiris – 643 001.
¶3The Divisional Manager, Tamil Nadu Tea Plantation, Pandiar Tea Division, The Nilgiris District. T. VINOD KUMAR
, J.
dh
11.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 4896 of 202 a nd WMP.No.5506 of 2021 T.Hariprasad ... Petitioner vs 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Tea Plantation Corporation Ltd., TANTEA, Coonoor, The Nilgiris – 643 001. 3. The Divisional Manager, Tamil Nadu Tea Plantation, Pandiar Tea Division, The Nilgiris District. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned proceeding vide No.Na.Ka.No.7840/2020/P2 dated 30.12.2020 signed on 31.12.2020 issued by the second respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and null and void and pass orders For Petitioner : Mr.G.Raja For Respondents : Mr.V.Veluchamy Additional Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.P.Raghunathan for Mr.T.S.Gopalan & Co. for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.