VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Palani, v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 4850/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to cancel patta Nos.1000 and 10 standing in the name of the respondents 5 and 6 respectively for the properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2According to the petitioner, the respondent No.5 illegally obtained patta No.1000 and the respondent No.6 has illegally obtained patta No.10 for the respective properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks for cancellation of the same through his representation dated

03.01.2026. Since the said representation has not been considered by the official respondents till date, this writ petition has been filed.

¶3Mr. D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 5 and 6, notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 as well as any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2026.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2026, seeking for cancellation of patta Nos.1000 and 10 issued in favour of the respondents 5 and 6 respectively for the respective properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 as well as any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 17-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The District Collector, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District.

3.The Thaslidhar, Tirupattur Taluk, Tirupattur District.

4.The Village Administrative Officer, Periyagaram Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Tirupattur District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

17-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Palani Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District. 3.The Thaslidhar, Tirupattur Taluk, Tirupattur District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Periyagaram Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Tirupattur District. 5.Pannerselvam, 6.Appu @ Kandasamy, Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd respondent to cancel the patta issued in favour of the 5th and 6th respondents in patta No.1000 and 10 based on the petitioners representation dated 03.01.2026 within stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For R1 to R4 R5 and R6 – Notice Dispensed with

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.