VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Gnanasekaran v. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
V. Lakshminarayananauthor
Case no.
WP 6040/2026

Judgment

ORDER Heard Mr.C.Prakasam for the petitioner, Mr.R.Murthy, Government Advocate for 1st respondent and Mr.V.Veeramani, Government Advocate for 2nd respondent.

2.The petitioner was employed as a Clerk in the 2nd respondent society. Pursuant to the directions of the 1st respondent, an inquiry was conducted under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983. The report resulted in a surcharge proceedings being initiated under Section 87 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983. In the Section 87 proceedings, the petitioner was found liable to pay a sum of Rs.4.77 lakhs (approximately). Therefore, he preferred an appeal before the Co-operative Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Villupuram, in C.M.A.No.47 of 2003. The said appeal was dismissed on 17.12.2008. Challenging the same, a writ petition came to be presented before this Court in W.P.No.9282 of 2009. A learned Single Judge held that the writ petition is not maintainable and directed the conversion of the writ petition into a revision on 18.10.2023. Despite the same, till date, the conversion into a revision has not been carried out.

3.Since the order of surcharge continues to be in force, the 1st respondent initiated attachment proceedings for recovery of the amounts due. He passed an order on 20.01.2026, attaching the salary of the petitioner. He directed a sum of Rs.9,860/- to be recovered from the salary of the petitioner every month. This direction was given to the present employer of the petitioner, namely, Neganur Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Neganur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District, the 3rd respondent herein. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition.

4.It is the grievance of the petitioner that a copy of Section 81 inquiry had not been furnished to him. Further, he pleads that the civil revision petition has not yet been numbered by the Registry of this Court. Hence, he should not be penalised for the same.

5.I have carefully considered the submissions of both sides and gone through the records.

6.The surcharge order has been confirmed in an appeal. It has not been kept in abeyance when the order was passed by this Court in W.P.No.9282 of 2009 on 18.10.2023. More than two and half years have lapsed, and till date, the petitioner has not secured any interim order staying the operation of the surcharge order or that of the order passed by the appellate authority in C.M.A.No.47 of 2003. When a decree holder, namely, the 3rd respondent has not been restrained by an order of any Court from recovering the amounts due, I cannot find fault with the order impugned in the present writ petition.

7.Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. The dismissal of this writ petition will not prevent the petitioner to take steps for the conversion of the writ petition into a revision and to move a stay application thereafter. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 27-02-2026 krk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative societies Tindivanam Circle, Tindivanam , Villupuram district

2.The Administrator Melokkaru primary agricultural cooperative credit society, Melolakkur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district

3.The Administrator Neganur Primary Agricultural cooperative credit society, Neganur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district WPeNo.e6040eofe2026 V.LAKSHMINARAYANANoJ. krk WPoNo.o6040oofo2026 and W.M.P.No.6554oofo2026 o 27-02-2026 6e/e6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.No.6554 of 2026 1. A.Gnanasekaran S/o. Aruldoss, No.33-A, Sunnambukara Street, Sirukadambur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district Petitioner(s) Vs 1. the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative societies Tindivanam Circle, Tindivanam , Villupuram district 2.The Administrator Melokkaru primary agricultural cooperative credit society, Melolakkur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district 3.The Administrator Neganur Primary Agricultural cooperative credit society, Neganur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings E.P. No. 58/ 2012- 2013 in Form No. 14(b) dated 20.01.2026 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prakasam Mr.R.Murthy Government Advocate for R1 Mr.V.Veeramani Government Advocate for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.