VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Perumal v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 5328/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to rectify the alleged errors in the UDR patta standing in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition and thereafter, to issue a fresh patta in favour of the petitioner, based on his representation, dated 13.10.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had given a representation on 13.10.2025 to the respondents for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Page No.2 of 6

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation, dated 13.10.2025 seeking for rectification of the alleged errors in the UDR patta and change of patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party, whom the 2nd Page No.3 of 6 respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

18.02.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The District Collector, District Collector office, Chengalpattu District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Chengalpattu Collector office campus, Chengalpattu District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Maduranthakam Taluk office, Chengalpattu District.

4.The Tahsildhar, Tahsildhar Office, Madhuranthagam, Chengalpattu District.

5.The Revenue Inspector, Vaiyavoor (pirka), Madhuranthagam taluk, Chengalpattu District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

18.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Perumal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector office, Chengalpattu District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Chengalpattu Collector office campus, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Maduranthakam Taluk office, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Tahsildhar, Tahsildhar Office, Madhuranthagam, Chengalpattu District. 5.The Revenue Inspector, Vaiyavoor (pirka), Madhuranthagam taluk, Chengalpattu District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to consider the petitioner's Page No.1 of 6 representation dated 13.10.2025 and direct the respondents to rectify the errors in the UDR patta classification vacant land to cultivated lands in Patta No.99 of petitioner's grandfather's land in Survey No.769/2A, Maamandur Village, Chengalpattu Dt and consequently change the patta in petitioner's name. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kishore For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.