VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Shanthi v. The State Represented By,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 4617/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)(a), 4(1), 5(1)(a) and 7(1)

(a) of ITP Act in Crime No.22 of 2026, Seeks anticipatory bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is ranked A2 in this case, she joined hands with the other accused( A1) rented the house and involved in running brothel business. Based on the secret information, the respondent police conducted search and rescued three victim. A1 in this case was arrested and based on the statement of A1, the role of the A2 was unearthed and added as an accused.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Court vide order dated 29.01.2026 in Crl.O.P.No.1917 of 2026 had dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner. He further submitted that subsequent to the dismissal of anticipatory bail petition, co-accused in this case has been granted anticipatory bail by order dated 27.01.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.143 of 2026, by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the co-accused has Page3 of 5 already been granted anticipatory bail by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate-1, Kancheepuram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; Page4 of 5

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

25.02.2026 gbi To

¶1Inspector of Police, Balu Chentty Chatram Police Station, Kancheepuram.

¶2The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶3The Judicial Magistrate-1, Kancheepuram Page5 of 5

K.RAJASEKAR, J. gbi

25.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25.02.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Shanthi ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, Inspector of Police, Balu Chentty Chatram Police Station, Kancheepuram. Crime No.22 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioners on Anticipatory Bail in the event of the arrest in connection with the Crime. No.22 of 2026, on the file of Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Vijaykumar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.