VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

T.Thanigaivanan v. Union of India, Rep by Its Secretary

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 February 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 5090/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to shift the petitioner to the old pension scheme from the New Pension scheme as per the option exercised by him so as to enable him to avail pension, provident fund, gratuity and such other services benefits.

¶2Mr.K.Ramana Moorthy, learned Senior Panel Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3Pursuant to the recruitment notification issued by the Indian Coast Guard for the posts of Yanthrik, Navik (General Duty) and Navik (Domestic Brach), the petitioner had applied for the same. The petitioner, having successfully participated in the selection process, was selected and appointed as Yantrik on 15.07.2004. It is the case of the petitioner that, as per the notification issued by the 2nd respondent dated 22.12.2003, the persons appointed on or after

01.01.2004 were denied pension under Old Pension Scheme and were brought under the New Pension Scheme. Accordingly, the petitioner was placed under National Pension System. Page4 of 6

¶4However, as per the circular dated 03.03.2003 issued by the 3rd respondent, facilitating the existing Central Government Employees who were recruited against the vacancies notified prior to 22.12.2003 to switch over from the New Pension Scheme to the Old Pension Scheme. The petitioner claiming to be falling within the specified category, had submitted an application on

28.04.2023 to the 8th respondent, seeking to switchover from New Pension scheme to the old pension scheme. In this regard, the 8th respondent had forwarded a proposal to the 7th respondent dated 14.08.2023 which forms part of Agenda points for XL Coast Guard Commander's Conference, however, no orders have been passed on the same, till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court may issue a direction to the 7th respondent to consider the proposal dated

14.08.2023 forwarded by the 8th respondent and pass orders on the same within the reasonable time that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶6Learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the proposal forwarded by the 8th respondent will be considered and appropriate orders would be passed. Page5 of 6

¶7In view of the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, the 7th respondent is directed to consider the proposal dated 14.08.2023 forwarded by the 8th respondent and pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. There shall order as to costs. 12-02-2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Nhs To

¶1Union Of India, Rep by its Secretary Government Of India, Ministry of Defence Room No. 101-A, South Block New Delhi -110 011.

¶2Union Of India, Rep by its Secretary Government Of India, Ministry Of Finance Kartavya Bhavani-1 New Delhi 110011.

¶3Union Of India, Rep by its Secretary Government Of India, Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department Of Pension and Pensioner's Welfare A Wing 3rd Floor, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market New Delhi 110011. Page6 of 6

M.DHANDAPANI, J. NHS

¶4The Director General of Coast Guard Coast Guard Headquarters, National Stadium Complex, New Delhi-110 011.

¶5The Controller General of Defence Accounts Ulan Batar Road, Palam Delhi Cantt-110 011.

¶6The Asst. Controller Of Defence Account, Coast Guard Pay And Account Office, 4th Floor, Coast Guard Otm Complex, 'A' Wing, C Block, Phase 2, Industrial Area, Sector 62, Noida – 201 309.

¶7The Officer-In-Charge Bureau Of Naviks Near To MCEDCL Office, Old Mumbai-Pune Highway Bhingari, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 221.

¶8The Commandant, Coast Guard Afloat Support Unit No.11 Coast Guard District (Goa) Coast Guard Enclave Chicoina, Bogmalo, Goa - 403 806.

¶9The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Draupadi Ghat, Saraswathi Vihar Colony, Ashok Nagar, Prayagraj-211 014. 12-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI T.Thanigaivanan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Union Of India, Rep by its Secretary Government Of India, Ministry of Defence Room No. 101-A, South Block New Delhi -110 011. 2. Union Of India, Rep by its Secretary Government Of India, Ministry Of Finance Kartavya Bhavani-1 New Delhi 110011. 3. Union Of India, Rep by its Secretary Government Of India, Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department Of Pension and Pensioner's Welfare A Wing 3rd Floor, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market New Delhi 110011. 4. The Director General of Coast Guard Coast Guard Headquarters, National Stadium Complex, New Delhi-110 011. 5. The Controller General of Defence Accounts Ulan Batar Road, Palam Delhi Cantt- 110 011. Page2 of 6 6. The Asst. Controller Of Defence Account, Coast Guard Pay And Account Office, 4th Floor, Coast Guard Otm Complex, 'A' Wing, C Block, Phase 2, Industrial Area, Sector 62, Noida – 201 309. 7. The Officer-In-Charge Bureau Of Naviks Near To MCEDCL Office, Old Mumbai-Pune Highway Bhingari, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 221. 8. The Commandant, Coast Guard Afloat Support Unit No.11 Coast Guard District (Goa) Coast Guard Enclave Chicoina, Bogmalo, Goa - 403 806. 9. The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Draupadi Ghat, Saraswathi Vihar Colony, Ashok Nagar, Prayagraj- 211 014. .. Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to place the petitioner from the New Pension scheme to the old pension scheme as per the option exercised by him dated 28.04.2023 and enable the petitioner for pension, provident fund and gratuity among other services benefits. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Alagu Goutham For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Ramana Moorthy, Senior Panel Counsel Page3 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.