VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Gnanam v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 5968/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to form and provide a proper access pathway to the petitioner's Natham house site situated in the address morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 25.09.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner claims that she has no access to reach her Natham house site at the address morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner had given a representation dated 25.09.2025 to the respondents requesting them to provide a proper access pathway to the petitioner's Natham house site. Since the same was not considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Page No.2 of 6

¶3Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶5For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 4th respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation, dated 25.09.2025 seeking to form and provide a proper access pathway to the petitioner's Natham house site situated at the address morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing all the necessary parties, whom the 2nd respondent deems it fit to enquire. Page No.3 of 6

¶6With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

20.02.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Krishnagiri District.

3.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Krishnagiri District.

4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

20.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE R.Gnanam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Krishnagiri District. 3.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Krishnagiri District. 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 to 4 respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2025 and consequently direct the 4th respondent to form and provide a proper access pathway to the Page No.1 of 6 petitioner's Natham house site situated in Old Survey No.51/2, subsequently renumbered as new Natham Survey No.51/17, at Sonarahalli Revenue Village, Goundanur Post, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vignesh For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.