VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Thangavel v. State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police,

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 February 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 3462/2026

Judgment

ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.732 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tiruppur, insofar as the petitioners are concerned.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the parents of the first accused. The main allegagion against the first accused is that he had committed criminal breach of trust along with second accused in the purchase of computers and other than that the amounts have come into the account of the petitioners, there is absolutely no material to show that the petitioners have conspired with the main accused.

¶3Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the first accused, who is working as System Analyst in the District Court, Tiruppur, conspired with the other accused and by fake bills, cheated the Court to the tune of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs). The money trail shows that the amounts have been credited into the accounts of the petitioners. Further, there are materials to show that the petitioners have abetted the first accused in committing the crime.

¶4At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. Further, as the petitioners are senior citizens, he sought the indulgence of this Court, to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court.

¶5In view of the aforesaid submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners qua withdrawal, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, Crl.M.P.No.2413 of 2026 is closed. However, the personal appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or any other date as may be required by the trial Court. The petitioners shall be duly represented by their counsel before the trial Court. Accordingly, Crl.M.P.No.2414 of 2026 is ordered. The petitioners are at liberty to raise all the grounds before the trial Court. 12-02-2026 SRM To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tiruppur.

¶2The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tiruppur City.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. SRM 12-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.Nos.2413 and 2414 of 2026 1. Thangavel 2. Murugathal ..Petitioners Vs 1. State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tiruppur City. (Cr. No.2 of 2024) 2. Vengatachalam ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records in CC.No.732 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tiruppur and quash the same insofar as the petitioners are concerned. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondent-1 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.