- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 February 2026
- Bench
- D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WP 6085/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Judgment
ORDER
The writ petition is filed to direct the third respondent to act upon the proceedings issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.1173/A1/2025 dated
01.08.2025 directing to take action on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 20.05.2025 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parent and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 within a time frame fixed by this Court.
¶2The petitioner made a representation on 20.05.2025 to the District Collector. In the said representation, certain grievances relating to maintenance and also enjoyment of her property and also treating her in an undignified manner by her own daughter and son-in-law are complained of. The petitioner ought to have filed the application before the Revenue Divisional Officer / third respondent herein. It seems that the petition was forwarded to the District Social Welfare Officer, who in turn had forwarded the same to the Revenue Divisional Officer.
¶3In view of the nature of relief that is to be granted, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage without notice to the fourth and fifth respondents. It is made clear that the Court is not making any findings on the claim of the petitioner or otherwise in the matter. Page3 of 5
¶4This writ petition is disposed of on the following terms:
(i) Within one week from the date of receipt of the web copy of the order, by duly enclosing the earlier representation dated 20.05.2025, let the petitioner make a fresh application addressed to the third respondent categorically mentioning what are the reliefs the petitioner wants and it is for the third respondent to consider the same in accordance with law.
(ii) The third respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as the private respondents and any other person who may be interested and decide the same in accordance with law.
(iii) As and when the application is made, let the application be decided as expeditiously as possible, in any event not later than five months from the date of receipt of the application.
(iv) No costs. 20-02-2026 NSL Page4 of 5 To
¶1The District Collector, Chennai District.
¶2The District Social Welfare Officer, North-Chennai, Singaravelar Maligai, 8th Floor, Chennai - 600 001.
¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tondiarpet, Chennai-North, Chennai District. WPoNo.o6085oofo2026 D.BHARATHAoCHAKRAVARTHY,oJ. NSL WPoNo.o6085oofo2026 20-02-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Farook Banu ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Chennai District. 2. The District Social Welfare Officer, North-Chennai, Singaravelar Maligai, 8th Floor, Chennai - 600 001. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tondiarpet, Chennai-North, Chennai District. 4. Jameela 5. Ismail ..Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to act upon the proceedings issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.1173/A1/2025 dated 01.08.2025 asking to take action on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 20.05.2025 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parent and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.Mano Bharathy M.C For Respondents: Mr.S.Senthil Murugan Special Government Pleader Page2 of 5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.