VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Mani v. The Registrar General

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 June 2026
Bench
S. M. Subramaniamauthor, N.Senthilkumar
Case no.
WP 8551/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S. M. SubramaniamFollow N.Senthilkumar

Judgment

ORDER (Made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The writ of mandamus has been instituted seeking a direction to the fourth respondent Principal Accountant General to repay the recovered amount of Rs.77,903/-, which was an excess salary paid to the writ petitioner.

¶2The petitioner was initially appointed as a Dalayat at District Munsif Court, Pochampalli, on 04.04.1996. He was promoted to the post of Junior Bailiff and retired from service in the year 2022. The grievances of the petitioner is that a notice was issued on 31.05.2022 and a sum of Rs.77,903/- was recovered on the ground that excess salary was paid to the petitioner in violation of pay rules in force. The pay was revised and accordingly, pension sanctioned and the petitioner is receiving pension for the past about 4 years. After a lapse of four years, the present writ petition has been instituted seeking refund of the amount recovered in the year 2022. The petitioner has not challenged the recovery proceedings or the notice issued for recovery of excess salary paid to him. In the absence of any challenge, no relief can be granted. That apart, learned counsel for the fourth respondent submitted that they have not recovered any amount, but, the relief sought for in the present Page3 of 4 writ petition is to refund the recovered amount from the fourth respondent. Therefore, the relief itself is not entertainable. In any event, the writ petition has been filed after a lapse of four years from the date of recovery as well as retirement. Thus, the writ petition is devoid of merits and hit by principles of laches. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gm To

¶1The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, High Court Campus, Chennai 600104.

¶2The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Court (V) Department, Fort Saint George, Chennai 9.

¶3The Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri.

¶4The Principal Accountant General (A & E) AG's Office (Audit) Complex, Anna Salai, Roast Revor Garden, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.

¶5The District Treasury Officer, Dharmapuri. Page4 of 4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. gm 09-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR S.Mani S/o.Sellan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. 2. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Court (V) Department, Fort Saint George, Chennai 9. 3. The Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri. 4. The Principal Accountant General (A & E) AG's Office (Audit) Complex, Anna Salai, Roast Revor Garden, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. 5. The District Treasury Officer, Dharmapuri. ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to repay the recovery amount Rs.77,903/- excess pay recovered from the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.12.2025. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.P.Thirumalaivasan For Respondents : Mr.M.Fakkir Mohideen [R1 & R3] Dr.R.Gouri, Government Counsel [R2 & R5] Mr.T.Ravikumar [R4] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.