VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl Techno Sales Corporation Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner St

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 6723/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondents.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.

¶3In this writ petition, the petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 08.10.2025 passed by the first respondent whereby the petitioner's appeal against the order dated 29.04.2024 for the tax period 2018-2019 has been rejected on the ground that it was filed beyond the condonable period of limitation.

¶4It is submitted that the petitioner had filed the said appeal before the first respondent on 18.09.2024. At the time of filing the appeal, the petitioner had also pre-deposited 10% of the disputed tax. The appeal was admitted and the case was listed for hearing on 15.11.2024. Page3 of 6

¶5However, thereafter, the first respondent passed the impugned order dated 08.10.2025, whereby the petitioner's appeal was rejected on the ground of limitation.

¶6It is noticed that there was only a marginal delay of 20 days beyond the condonable period of limitation prescribed under Section 107 of the respective GST Enactments.

¶7At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit another 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% already pre-deposited at the time of filing the appeal before the 1st Respondent as a condition for denovo adjudication.

¶8The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder:- "The petitioner oblige to pay additional 15% of the disputed taxes in addition to the 10% paid as per-deposit at the time of filing an appeal."

¶9Following the consistent view taken by this Court under similar circumstances, the case is remitted back to the 1st respondent to pass a fresh order on merits , subject to the Petitioner depositing an additional 15% of the Page4 of 6 disputed tax in cash, over and above the 10% already pre-deposited at the time of filing the appeal before the 1st Respondent on 18.09.2024. The said amount shall be deposited within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶10Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 16.12.2023 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

08.10.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 16.12.2023.

¶11In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the 1st Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically raised/vacated.

¶12It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing another 15% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. Page5 of 6

¶13In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the 1st Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶14Needless to state, before passing any such order, the 1st Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶15This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 27-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order AV To

1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal Chennai I, Greams Road, Main Building 2nd Floor, Chennai 600 006.

2.The Deputy State Tax Officer Annasalai Assessment Circle, PAPJM Annex Building, IV Floor, #1, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. WPoNo.o6723oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. AV WPoNo.o6723oofo2026 and WMPoNos.7302o&o7304oofo2026 27-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.7302 & 7304 of 2026 Tvl Techno Sales Corporation Private Limited (Represented by its Director Sunaiana Joseph) 715-A, 7th Floor, Spencer Plaza, Suite No. 409,Mount Road, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal Chennai I, Greams Road, Main Building 2nd Floor, Chennai 600 006. 2. The Deputy State Tax Officer Annasalai Assessment Circle, PAPJM Annex Building, IV Floor, #1, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent herein in Order No. - ZD331025055657F dated 08.10.2025 issued along with Memorandum in APG/203/2025 dated 30.09.2025 and quash the same while also directing the 1st respondent herein to admit the appeal filed by the petitioner in FORM GST APL - 01 dated 18.09.2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B Syed Abdul Wakeel For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.