VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

J.Thirumurugan v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 6931/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the respondents 1 to 4 from interfering with the petitioner's right to enjoy peaceful possession of the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026.

2.The petitioner claims that he is not aware of any land acquisition proceedings initiated against the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to the Writ Petition. According to the petitioner, all the revenue records stand in the name of the petitioner. While so, all of a sudden, the respondents are now attempting to evict the petitioner from the property on the ground that the property has already been acquired in accordance with law. In such circumstances, the petitioner had given a representation on 06.01.2026 to the respondents 1 to 4 to forbear them from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. Since the said representation was not considered, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. Page2 of 4

3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the 5th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within the time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

5.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 4th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026, seeking to forbear the respondents 1 to 4 from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To

¶1The District Collector Collectorate, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri district.

¶2The Special Tahsildar (LA) Adi Dravidar Welfare, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri district.

¶3The Revenue Divisional officer Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri district.

¶4The Revenue Tahsildar Dharmapuri taluk, Dharmapuri district. 03-03-2026 Page4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.Thirumurugan S/o. Late. T.K.Jayapal, 8/898 V.Jattihalli, Kumarasamipet, Dharmapuri 636701. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collectorate, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 2. The Special Tahsildar (LA) Adi Dravidar Welfare, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Revenue Tahsildar Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 5. J.Vasantha Kumar S/o. Late. T.K.Jayapal, V.Jattihalli, Kumarasamipet, Dharmapuri 636701. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 Page1 of 4 from interfering with the petitioners right to property measuring 13.5 cents bearing SF No. 102, A Reddihalli Village, Dharmapuri Taluk and District until the procedure established by law under Article 300A of the constitution is followed, by considering his representation dated 06.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Adhishree For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader (for R1 to 4)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.